Under what circumstance is it appropriate to suspend a security officer?

Suspending a security officer is generally appropriate when there is a pattern of behavior indicating that the officer is not meeting the company’s standards or policies. In the given scenario, misconduct that continues after a written reprimand demonstrates a failure to correct the problematic behavior despite being warned. This indicates a serious issue that likely affects the officer's performance and the overall functioning of the security team.

A single incident of misconduct might not warrant suspension, as it could be an isolated mistake rather than a reflection of the officer's overall conduct or capability. In contrast, ongoing issues that persist despite prior warnings signal that the behavior is not being rectified, which justifies disciplinary action such as suspension.

Absences without leave can be serious, but they would typically need to be evaluated in the context of the company’s policy on attendance. Likewise, tardiness, while concerning if it happens repeatedly, might not always lead to suspension unless it violates specific policies that have been communicated to the officer. Thus, the ongoing misconduct following a reprimand is the clearest basis for suspension, indicating a continued disregard for professional standards.