Why is electronic surveillance considered the least desirable form of supervision?

Electronic surveillance is viewed as the least desirable form of supervision primarily because it raises significant concerns regarding privacy. This form of monitoring often involves the collection of sensitive information without the direct oversight and interaction that traditional supervisory methods provide. Privacy laws in many jurisdictions, including California, emphasize the protection of individuals' rights to privacy, making the implementation of such surveillance potentially problematic and legally dubious.

Moreover, the lack of direct supervision means that electronic surveillance can lead to a disconnect between management and employees, impeding effective communication and trust. This remote method of oversight may not yield the personal engagement necessary for a supportive work environment, which can negatively impact employee morale and productivity.

In this context, while issues like susceptibility to hacking, costs, and data limitations may be relevant to other forms of supervision, the core issue at hand is the privacy implications and the absence of personal contact in electronic surveillance that makes it less favorable.